ARTICLE
20 August 2026

柔性防护结构破坏机理与设计对策

嘉焕 吴1 思婷 方1 雨阳 吴1 芊芊 邓2 春 柳2
Show Less
1 广东潮汕环线高速公路有限公司, 中国
2 广东和立交通养护科技有限公司, 中国
ERA 2026 , 4(8), 60–63; https://doi.org/10.61369/ERA.2026080030
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee Art and Technology, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

在山区地质灾害防护工程里,柔性防护体系易出现各类失效问题,但现阶段针对其破坏规律与优化设计方案的研究仍较为有限。本文依托西南地区11处实地工程点位开展现场调研,重点分析坡面灾害冲击作用下防护结构的失效形式与内在机理。分析结果表明,该类防护结构常见的失效形式包含4大类型,且钢柱出现屈曲变形的概率远高于其他的失效类型,边界处的滑移锁死更是导致该现象的主要因素,基于此制定了相应的结构优化措施。

Keywords
柔性防护结构
破坏机理
设计对策
钢柱屈曲
滑移锁死
References

[1] 赵世春, 余志祥, 赵雷, 等. 被动防护网系统强冲击作用下的传力破坏机制[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(10):11.
[2] EOTA, ETAG 27. Guideline for European Technical approval of falling rock protection kits [M]. European Organization for Technical Approvals, 2008.
[3] Liu Chun, Yu Zhixiang, Zhao Shichun. Quantifying the impact of a debris avalanche against a flexible barrier by coupled DEM-FEM analyses [J]. Landslides, 2020, 17:33-47.
[4] Spadari M, Giacomini A, Buzzi O, et al. Prediction of the Bullet Effect for Rockfall Barriers: a Scaling Approach [J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2012,
45(2):131-144.
[5] Hambleton J P, Buzzi O, Giacomini A, et al. Perforation of Flexible Rockfall Barriers by Normal Block Impact [J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2013, 46(3): 515-526.
[6]Ashwood W, Hungr O. Estimating total resisting force in flexible barrier impacted by a granular avalanche using physical and numerical modeling [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(10): 1700-1717.
[7]Tan DY, Yin JH, Feng WQ, et al. Large-scale physical modelling study of a flexible barrier under the impact of granular flows [J]. Natural Hazards & Earth System Science,2018, 18(10): 2625-2640.
[8] 中华人民共和国铁道行业标准. TB/T3089-2004铁路沿线斜坡柔性安全防护网[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2004.

Share
Back to top