Volume 2,Issue 6
产教融合共同体视域下“多语言程序设计+数字经济专项人才培养”的“四元协同”机制研究
产教融合是破解数字人才供需结构性矛盾的关键路径。本文以产教融合共同体理论为分析框架，以广州理工学院“多语言程序设计+数字经济专项人才培养”实验班为案例，系统探讨了高校、企业、科研机构、行业协会四元主体在数字人才培养中的协同机制。研究发现，四元协同面临“价值共识不足、资源共享不畅、利益联结松散、责任分担模糊”四重困境。基于案例实践，本文构建了“价值共识—资源共用—利益共享—责任共担”四维协同机制模型，并提出“制度化契约、平台化载体、项目化运作、数据化评价”四位一体的优化路径。研究为财经类高校深化产教融合、推进数字人才培养提供了理论参照与实践指引。
[1] Zhuang T, Shi J. Engagement, determinants and challenges: a multinational systematic review of education-focused university-industry collaborations[J]. Educational Review,2022(01):1-29.
[2] Vuoriainen A, Rikala P, Heilala V, et al. The six C’s of successful higher education-industry collaboration in engineering education: a systematic literature review[J].European Journal of Engineering Education,2024(01):1-25.
[3] 秦甜帆, 周海涛. 新兴交叉专业融合育人的基本逻辑、实践困境与创新路径[J]. 现代大学教育,2025(01):84-91.
[4] Klein J T. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice[M]. Detroit: Wayne State University Press,1990.
[5] Repko A F, Szostak R, Buchberger M P. Introduction to interdisciplinary studies[M]. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications,2025.
[6] Zeidan H, Rai S S, Zweekhorst M. Making sense of transdisciplinarity in education: re-visiting its conceptualisation, configuration and competencies[J]. Review of Education,2026(01):e70147.
[7] Spady W G. Outcome-based education: critical issues and answers[M]. Arlington: American Association of School Administrators,1994.
[8] Harden R M. Outcome-based education: the future is today[J]. Medical Teacher,2007,29(07):625-629.
[9] 闫广芬, 杜剑涛, 马立超. 中国特色视域下的交叉学科：内在逻辑与建设路向[J]. 教育研究,2024(12):29-39.
[10] 祝智庭, 戴岭, 姜浩哲. 学科整合教育：教育强国建设的内生新动能[J]. 中国远程教育,2025(50):3-19.
[11] Visscher-Voerman J I A, Eshuis E H, Velthuis C H, et al. Enhancing interdisciplinary education: insights from a comprehensive review[J]. European Journal of Engineering Education,2025:1-25.
[12] Wing J M. Computational thinking[J]. Communications of the ACM,2006,49(03):33-35.