Volume 2,Issue 9
跨境风险治理结构理论——CBRGF 框架的构建与阐释
跨境经营中的风险治理长期面临制度差异与组织能力之间的张力。现有风险管理框架多聚焦于流程或合规，难以系统应对跨境场景下由制度异质性引发的结构性风险。本研究提出跨境风险治理框架，将风险界定为制度差异与治理能力缺口协同作用的结果，构建了以“结构、模型、能力、决策”为核心语言的理论体系。通过引入成熟度评估工具与结构化设计路径，该理论实现了从抽象风险感知到可量化、可操作治理方案的有效转化。中非跨境数据、供应链及反腐败三个典型案例验证了理论的解释力与落地性。本理论旨在为企业跨境经营提供可复制、可持续的风险治理能力，并为相关领域的学术研究提供新的分析框架。
[1]Hutchins G. ISO 31000: 2018 enterprise risk management[M]. Greg Hutchins, 2018.
[2]Muhsyaf S A, Cahyaningtyas S R, Sasanti E E. Three line of defense: An effective risk management[C]//18th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2021). Atlantis Press, 2021: 85-91.
[3]Akpınar N, Fernández P, Tost M. Aligning EU due diligence requirements with international standards: A benchmarking approach[J]. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2025, 24: 101715.
[4]Malega P, Majerník M. Standardisation of compliance management and process quality in the organization based on the integrated management system[J]. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 2024, 28(3): 82-99.
[5]Lie L. OECD principles of corporate governance[M]//Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023: 2497-2500.
[6]Staunton C, Edgcumbe A, Abdulrauf L, et al. Cross-border data sharing for research in Africa: An analysis of the data protection and research ethics requirements in 12 jurisdictions[J]. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2025, 12(1): lsaf002.
[ 7 ] N o r t h , D . C . 1 9 9 0 . I n s t i t u t i o n s , I n s t i t u t i o n a l C h a n g e a n d E c o n o m i cPerformance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8]Xu J. Unsolicited justice: the impact of FCPA enforcement on corruption and investment[J]. Review of International Political Economy, 2025, 32(5): 1285-1310.
[9]Scott W R. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities[M]. Sage publications, 2013.
[10]Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations[M]. Sage publications, 2001.
[11]Jaccard J, Jacoby J. Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists[M]. Guilford publications, 2019.
[12] 王玎. 数据出境安全评估的制度构造[J]. 法律科学( 西北政法大学学报),2025,43(05):100-111.
[13] 丁小桃, 洪永红. 肯尼亚首部《数据保护法》值得关注[J]. 中国投资( 中英文),2024,(ZB):88-89.
[14] 坦桑尼亚劳工法，https://natlex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/natlex2/files/download/68319/TZA68319%20RE2019.pdf
[15] 胡玭玭. 中国企业反腐败合规制度的现状和思考—— 美国《反海外腐败法》梳理和借鉴[J]. 北外法学,2022,(01):50-67+248-249.
[16] 以《中华人民共和国监察法》修改为契机推动监察工作规范化法治化正规化[J]. 中国纪检监察研究,2025,(04):18-26.